<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Thoughts &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martijnpannevis.nl/blog/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martijnpannevis.nl/blog</link>
	<description>It compiles; Let's ship it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>That works nice in theory, but will never work in practice</title>
		<link>http://martijnpannevis.nl/blog/2008/03/19/the-problem-with-standards-is-that-there-are-so-many-of-them/</link>
		<comments>http://martijnpannevis.nl/blog/2008/03/19/the-problem-with-standards-is-that-there-are-so-many-of-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martijnpannevis.nl/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been planning to do more &#8220;I read this, liked it, have a look there&#8221; type of posts. Maybe I&#8217;ll create a specific linkblog for it, or work some del.icio.us magic,  or just stick with small posts. Not sure on that one yet, but this is a good article, I really liked (as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been planning to do more &#8220;I read this, liked it, have a look there&#8221; type of posts. Maybe I&#8217;ll create a specific linkblog for it, or work some del.icio.us magic,  or just stick with small posts. Not sure on that one yet, but this is a good article, I really liked (as most of Joel&#8217;s articles).</p>
<p>Two quotes:<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The IE team has to walk a fine line between tight support for W3C standards and making sure sites coded for earlier versions of IE still display correctly.â€ This is incorrect. Itâ€™s not a fine line. Itâ€™s a line of negative width. There is no place to walk. They are damned if they do and damned if they donâ€™t.</em> &#8221;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;As usual, the idealists are 100% right in principle and, as usual, the pragmatists are right in practice. The flames will continue for years. This debate precisely splits the world in two. If you have a way to buy stock in Internet flame wars, now would be a good time to do that.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Without further ado: Go! Read: <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/03/17.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.joelonsoftware.com');">Martian Headsets &#8211; Joel on Software</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://martijnpannevis.nl/blog/2008/03/19/the-problem-with-standards-is-that-there-are-so-many-of-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

